On January 24, 2026, Alex Pretti, a 37-year-old intensive care nurse and U.S. citizen, was fatally shot by U.S. Border Patrol agents during a federal immigration enforcement operation in Minneapolis. The shooting occurred in the Whittier neighborhood amid ongoing protests against Operation Metro Surge, a large federal initiative in Minnesota aimed at ramping up immigration enforcement. The operation had already drawn widespread scrutiny, with civil-rights groups, community organizations, and local residents expressing concerns about its scale, tactics, and potential for escalation. Pretti’s death quickly became a focal point in national debates over the appropriate role of federal agents in domestic enforcement operations and the use of lethal force.
Department of Homeland Security officials described the shooting as a defensive measure, claiming that Pretti approached agents while armed and resisted instructions. While local authorities and bystander video footage confirm that Pretti possessed a firearm at some point, multiple recordings also show him holding a phone in the moments immediately before the shooting, fueling controversy over whether deadly force was justified. Civil-rights advocates and community members have emphasized that the videos raise serious questions about agent behavior, the interpretation of threat levels, and adherence to protocols designed to minimize civilian harm during enforcement operations. The incident illustrates the complexity of assessing high-stress encounters in real time and the divergence between official accounts and eyewitness observations.
Pretti’s death marked the second fatal shooting of a U.S. citizen by federal immigration agents in Minneapolis that month, following the January 7 death of Renée Good during a separate enforcement action. The pattern of consecutive shootings has heightened concern among local residents, activists, and elected officials about the frequency, scale, and oversight of federal operations targeting immigrant communities. Public outcry has included large demonstrations calling for independent investigations, enhanced transparency, and reforms in how federal agents engage with civilians, particularly when protests or bystander presence are involved. Advocates argue that accountability mechanisms must be strengthened to prevent unnecessary loss of life and to restore community trust.
The Minneapolis incidents have also had ripple effects beyond the city. In Santa Ana, California, protests responding to the federal enforcement actions turned violent when 21-year-old Kaden Rummler was struck in the face by a projectile fired by a federal officer, resulting in permanent blindness in his left eye. Videos and hospital records confirm that Rummler was participating in a protest outside a federal building when he was injured, and he underwent extensive surgical treatment afterward. The injury has intensified discussions about the appropriate use of non-lethal crowd-control measures, the training of federal personnel in managing demonstrations, and the broader implications of aggressive enforcement tactics on civil liberties and public safety.
These events have fueled national debate about federal law-enforcement methods, particularly in the context of immigration enforcement operations. Critics argue that the deaths and injuries highlight systemic issues in the deployment of federal agents, including inadequate de-escalation strategies, disproportionate use of force, and insufficient oversight. Supporters of the operations contend that federal agents face unpredictable risks and must have the authority to respond to perceived threats. The contrast between official statements, video evidence, and eyewitness accounts underscores the challenge of evaluating the legitimacy of force, weighing officer safety against civilian rights, and establishing clear protocols for accountability.