VP JD Vance Breaks Senate Tie To Advance $9.4 Billion Rescissions Package

Vice President J.D. Vance Breaks Senate Tie to Advance $9.4 Billion Spending Cuts

This week, Vice President J.D. Vance cast two pivotal tie-breaking votes in a narrowly split Senate (50–50), enabling debate on a sweeping $9.4 billion rescissions package. The legislation, driven by President Trump’s administration, aims to claw back previously approved federal spending and includes:

  • $8.3 billion in reductions for foreign aid, primarily targeting funding for the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID).
  • $1.1 billion removed from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB), affecting NPR, PBS, and numerous local stations.

Moderate Republican senators—Mitch McConnell, Lisa Murkowski, and Susan Collins—joined Democrats in opposing the procedural votes, citing lack of transparency and concerns about the cuts’ impact on vital services (e.g. emergency broadcasting, health programs, rural media) (WUSFCBS News).

Senate Majority Leader John Thune negotiated amendments that saved $400 million from cuts to PEPFAR (President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief) and protected other critical programs, including maternal health, nutrition, and funding to specific countries like Jordan and Egypt. As a result, the bill was reshaped before moving forward (Wikipedia).

Following extensive “vote‑a‑rama” debate, the Senate passed the revised bill (51–48). It now returns to the House for approval by a Friday midnight deadline, after which, if signed, the rescinded funds must remain withheld under law or revert back to original spending plans (CBS News).

Proponents argue the cuts are a symbolic and practical first step toward fiscal discipline and reducing government spending on programs perceived as partisan or wasteful. Critics—particularly Senate Republicans like Collins and Murkowski, rural lawmakers, and Democrats—warn the move undermines congressional budget authority, jeopardizes essential global health and local public media services, and risks complicating future bipartisan funding negotiations (The Week).

Related Posts

SUPREME COURT DROPS EARTH-SHAKING 7-2 DECISION

Supreme Court Ruling Makes It Harder for Veterans to Win Benefit Claims In a 7-2 decision in Bufkin v. Collins, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that courts must…

Neighbors Hated My House Color and Repainted It While I Was Away — I Was Enraged & Took My Revenge

After a two-week holiday, Victoria returned home to a shocking discovery: her nosy neighbors had repainted the bright yellow house that her late husband had lovingly decorated….

A Neighbor Called The Cops On Two Little Girls Selling Lemonade—But She Picked The Wrong Officer

They were just two sisters on the corner of their neighborhood, a folding table set up beneath the summer sun. Their sign, drawn in crayon and a…

3 Wedding Stories That Will Definitely Surprise You

Liam’s wedding had all the makings of a perfect day—elegant flowers, glowing candles, and a bride who had charmed our entire family. Denise had made me, Liam’s…

Pamela Anderson Found New Love Again, And You Better Sit Down Because You Will Surely Recognize Him

According to reports, Pamela Anderson and Liam Neeson are having fun together as their relationship quietly grows, indicating that a new Hollywood romance is on the horizon….

My Annoying Neighbor and I Went to War Over a Lawn Gnome, We Never Saw the Ending Coming

The sun hadn’t even fully stretched across the sky when I stepped outside, barefoot and hopeful, holding a gnome the size of a cantaloupe like he was…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *