A U.S. District Judge, Maryellen Noreika, dismissed the legal case against Hunter Biden after President Joe Biden granted his son a full pardon. This occurred just two days after the pardon was issued, ending a case involving federal tax and gun charges. Hunter Biden had faced accusations of tax evasion and unlawful firearm possession, with prosecutors claiming he failed to pay federal taxes and falsely denied drug use on a firearm application.

The pardon, announced on Sunday, led Judge Noreika to formally terminate the proceedings, as the case had not yet reached sentencing. The judge cited the lack of precedent for such a case. While the Biden administration had previously stated the president would not interfere in his son’s legal issues, the timing of the pardon has sparked controversy. Critics argue it undermines the justice system, while supporters view it as an act of compassion from a father.

Hunter Biden’s legal troubles were complicated by his struggles with addiction, which he has publicly acknowledged. The case had been proceeding with intense media attention, and a plea deal earlier in 2023 fell apart under judicial scrutiny. The dismissal of the case means there will be no sentencing or further legal consequences for him related to these charges.

The pardon has ignited political debate. Republicans accuse President Biden of misusing his executive power, while Democrats defend the decision as a personal one. The broader implications concern the ethical boundaries of presidential pardons, particularly when applied to family members. As Hunter Biden’s legal chapter closes, the political ramifications for President Biden, especially in the 2024 election cycle, continue to unfold.