Over the weekend, U.S. President Donald Trump ordered strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites—Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan—in response to an alleged sleeper-cell terror threat tied to Iran. These strikes came shortly after Israeli missiles initially targeted Iran, escalating tensions in the region. Trump’s actions, framed as a preemptive defense, drew sharp criticism from Russian President Vladimir Putin, who labeled the attacks “unprovoked aggression” and declared his support for Iran. Meeting with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi in Moscow, Putin expressed solidarity, suggesting that Russia would assist Iran in navigating the crisis and possibly support them further if conflict expands. His remarks signaled a significant geopolitical shift and a clear stance amid rising global concerns over potential war.
Counterterrorism expert Will Geddes analyzed Putin’s response, noting that while it may largely be posturing, Russia likely has already been arming Iran and may now intensify that support. Geddes warned that this development undermines Russia’s previous role as a mediator between Israel and Iran and could destabilize the region further. Though Putin has not indicated any immediate military intervention, his backing of Iran alters diplomatic dynamics, putting added pressure on Western powers. Iran, in turn, declared its right to self-defense and praised Russia’s alignment as being on “the right side of history.” With these power plays unfolding, the Middle East faces an increasingly volatile situation where further conflict could be influenced heavily by Russia’s next steps and the global community’s reaction to Trump’s assertive military approach.
