A video clips after Charlie Kirk was shot at Utah Valley University show a bearded man in a backwards cap raising his arms and shouting “USA! USA!” while others dove to the ground. Many viewers condemned the footage, believing he was celebrating Kirk’s death.

The man, who identifies himself as David on social media platform X, released a video defending his actions. He insists he was not cheering violence but trying to calm panic, projecting strength, or creating a distraction. According to David, he initially thought he heard a loud crack—maybe fireworks or a prank. When he saw no smoke, he realized it might be a gunshot.

David also says he is only “minimally familiar” with Charlie Kirk’s content and would never wish harm on anyone.  But in follow-up posts, he used more opaque language, mentioning “my soldiers, including Charlie,” and complaining about “mockery” by others. He didn’t clarify who he meant by “soldiers.”

Despite his explanation, many remain skeptical. The video’s visuals—him standing while others fell, his raised arms, and his shouts—made a strong impression. This controversy underscores how quickly online tragedy can be distorted. Without full context, people make assumptions. David says he wanted to help, not hurt. The public and media now await more clarity as the debates around intent, perception, and accountability continue.